- Classic Regression Craps Strategy Games
- Classic Regression Craps Strategy Tactics
- Classic Regression Craps Strategy For Beginners
- Classic Regression Craps Strategy
While there are countless strategies out there, the most successful and easiest to learn is 'regression betting' in the game of Craps. The idea behind regression betting is that you hit big on your wins, and avoid losses whenever possible in order to make a splash. A regression system is one that usually can provide you with a profit after just one win at the tables. One of the most popular regression systems begins by betting $30 six and eight. You just place $30 each on both the six and eight, so you have $60 in play. When either number hits, you win $35 (at 7:6 odds). My boot camp strategy calls for anywhere from a 3 - 1 to a 5 - 1 regression after a specified number of hits. For example, let's say you start with $640 across and leave it up for three hits. After three hits you'll have racked somewhere between $420 and $600, depending on whether or not you get lucky and collect on a few fours and tens. Craps Classic Regression there is a search function which you can use to locate specific games. Some notable roulette games which you can play on Craps Classic Regression the Craps Classic Regression platform are Lightning Roulette, Immersive Roulette, Auto Roulette, and Speed. Craps is the perfect example to demonstrate how these strategies work out. There are many gambling strategies out there, but this is just a look at three simple ones: Classic Regression, Three Point Molly, and All but Seven.
Thread Rating:
Classic Regression Craps Strategy Games
This is the 6/8 drop 4 to 64 adding the hardways system. I currently use this at the live tables and works very well for a good night out on a small bankroll.
Wincraps users don't forget to adjust the Config > Probabilities > change 7 to 4 for live table feel.
CG, have you ever logged your roll results, specifically those where you are allowed to roll however you can get away with? Those which don't hit the back wall fully?
CG, have you ever logged your roll results, specifically those where you are allowed to roll however you can get away with? Those which don't hit the back wall fully?
This strategy does not affect in any way hitting the back wall, they are random rolls from random shooters. the casino has cooled off with that 'Both dice hitting back wall thing' Even though I do not get hedging opportunities, this strategy does pretty good.
As far as win to loss ratio: I have 69.57/30.43
I do however incorporate the 4th,5th,6th number firebet hedging with this system but is not included in the wincraps file.
As far as win to loss ratio: I have 69.57/30.43
Sorry, I think I was unclear. I meant your 'live throw' results. When you stand in a casino, have you ever studiously tracked your results?
Sorry, I think I was unclear. I meant your 'live throw' results. When you stand in a casino, have you ever studiously tracked your results?
Hello, I just wanted to share a strategy I use at the casino when playing craps.
*Bank roll $300.00
Primary target numbers rolled are: 6 & 8.
or
*Shooting from table position 1 (corner table) using the '6/2 top, 2/4 facing me' set.
Primary target numbers rolled are: also 6 & 8.
1) Start by placing the 6/8 for $12 each.
(at this point i'm -$24 from my chip stack)
2) After 1 win, I drop $4.00 on the table and tell the dealer to power press to $30
Classic Regression Craps Strategy Tactics
(at this point i'm -$28 from my chip stack)
3) After another win:
a) if the powerpress wins again, I take $13 change and tell dealer '64 across including the point'
(at this point i'm -$15 from my chip stack)
b) if the other number wins I drop $8 on the table and tell the dealer '64 across including the point'
(at this point i'm -$36 from my chip stack)
Now the fun begins.
4) After each win:
a) If 4 or 10 win, I drop $7 on the table and tell dealer to colour up $25 to my chip stack.
b) If 5, 6, 8 or 9 wins, I drop $11 on the table and tell dealer to colour up $25 to my chip stack.
I do acknowledge I'm still at a negative at this point if I choose to leave all my bets in play, but I do tend to pull ahead quite a bit in the long haul prolonging my table play.
(In most cases win or lose, I will have only have a small portion of my bank roll at risk)
5) As a side bet:
a) $5/firebet (Hedging at 4th number for $120Lay, 5th for $750Lay, 6th for Max/Lay.
b) $20 on the hardways ($5 each) Full parley 1 time only then same bet thereafter.
(I realize that yes the extra $25.00 side bets put me to -$40 or -$61)
(Average bet is $35.00 and in most cases am awarded an $18.00 meal credit after 4 hrs of play)
I'm always open to suggestions for improvement. ;)
Attached is an updated WinCraps Classic file
What is a 64 across including the point? Most of my craps is just playing the pass line so I've got no clue.
I avoid betting passline for each shooter.
if I'm shooting I just 'Doey/Don't' on the passline and place 0 on shooters point and 10 odds behind the passline bet.
What is a 64 across including the point? Most of my craps is just playing the pass line so I've got no clue.
$10 each on 4, 5, 9, and 10, and $12 each on 6 and 8 for a total of $64
$10 each on 4, 5, 9, and 10, and $12 each on 6 and 8 for a total of $64
The $64 across is including the point.
To Regress or Not to Regress? By Frank Scoblete
My colleagues in Golden Touch™ Craps Inc., Dominator and Mr. Finesse, are advocates of regression betting as a means of securing wins and avoiding losses. A typical regression play, called the $110 one-hit-and-down, would go like this: Poker font.
The shooter has established his point. You place $110 inside; that's $25 on the 5 and 9, $30 on the 6 and 8. The shooter has 18 ways to hit these four numbers. If he does, the payoff is $35 on the first hit. Once that hit takes place, you lower your bet to $22 across, securing a profit of $13. Now, the rest of this shooter's roll is pure profit.
The thinking here is that the player has a 50-percent chance of winning this wager on any given roll as there are 36 possible combinations of which the 'one-hit-and-down' bettor has 18 of them favoring him. How long would you leave your $110 at risk? Some players would leave it up until it hits or loses to the 7. Others will give themselves a few shots at it before pulling it back.
Is this a good way to wager? Actually, yes, it is, well, kind of.
Wincraps users don't forget to adjust the Config > Probabilities > change 7 to 4 for live table feel.
CG, have you ever logged your roll results, specifically those where you are allowed to roll however you can get away with? Those which don't hit the back wall fully?
CG, have you ever logged your roll results, specifically those where you are allowed to roll however you can get away with? Those which don't hit the back wall fully?
This strategy does not affect in any way hitting the back wall, they are random rolls from random shooters. the casino has cooled off with that 'Both dice hitting back wall thing' Even though I do not get hedging opportunities, this strategy does pretty good.
As far as win to loss ratio: I have 69.57/30.43
I do however incorporate the 4th,5th,6th number firebet hedging with this system but is not included in the wincraps file.
As far as win to loss ratio: I have 69.57/30.43
Sorry, I think I was unclear. I meant your 'live throw' results. When you stand in a casino, have you ever studiously tracked your results?
Sorry, I think I was unclear. I meant your 'live throw' results. When you stand in a casino, have you ever studiously tracked your results?
Yes, actually when throwing Left side of stickman using the 4/6, 2/2 set gives me repeating 6's/8's/10's/hard 10's averaging 10 rolls before 7 out. Highest rolls 44 There is an odd time will PSO.
Hello, I just wanted to share a strategy I use at the casino when playing craps.
*Bank roll $300.00
*Shooting from table position 8 (Right side of stick man) using the '4/4 top, 2/2 facing me' set.
Primary target numbers rolled are: 6 & 8.
or
*Shooting from table position 1 (corner table) using the '6/2 top, 2/4 facing me' set.
Primary target numbers rolled are: also 6 & 8.
1) Start by placing the 6/8 for $12 each.
(at this point i'm -$24 from my chip stack)
2) After 1 win, I drop $4.00 on the table and tell the dealer to power press to $30
Classic Regression Craps Strategy Tactics
(at this point i'm -$28 from my chip stack)
3) After another win:
a) if the powerpress wins again, I take $13 change and tell dealer '64 across including the point'
(at this point i'm -$15 from my chip stack)
b) if the other number wins I drop $8 on the table and tell the dealer '64 across including the point'
(at this point i'm -$36 from my chip stack)
Now the fun begins.
4) After each win:
a) If 4 or 10 win, I drop $7 on the table and tell dealer to colour up $25 to my chip stack.
b) If 5, 6, 8 or 9 wins, I drop $11 on the table and tell dealer to colour up $25 to my chip stack.
I do acknowledge I'm still at a negative at this point if I choose to leave all my bets in play, but I do tend to pull ahead quite a bit in the long haul prolonging my table play.
(In most cases win or lose, I will have only have a small portion of my bank roll at risk)
5) As a side bet:
a) $5/firebet (Hedging at 4th number for $120Lay, 5th for $750Lay, 6th for Max/Lay.
b) $20 on the hardways ($5 each) Full parley 1 time only then same bet thereafter.
(I realize that yes the extra $25.00 side bets put me to -$40 or -$61)
(Average bet is $35.00 and in most cases am awarded an $18.00 meal credit after 4 hrs of play)
I'm always open to suggestions for improvement. ;)
Attached is an updated WinCraps Classic file
What is a 64 across including the point? Most of my craps is just playing the pass line so I've got no clue.
I avoid betting passline for each shooter.
if I'm shooting I just 'Doey/Don't' on the passline and place 0 on shooters point and 10 odds behind the passline bet.
What is a 64 across including the point? Most of my craps is just playing the pass line so I've got no clue.
$10 each on 4, 5, 9, and 10, and $12 each on 6 and 8 for a total of $64
$10 each on 4, 5, 9, and 10, and $12 each on 6 and 8 for a total of $64
The $64 across is including the point.
To Regress or Not to Regress? By Frank Scoblete
My colleagues in Golden Touch™ Craps Inc., Dominator and Mr. Finesse, are advocates of regression betting as a means of securing wins and avoiding losses. A typical regression play, called the $110 one-hit-and-down, would go like this: Poker font.
The shooter has established his point. You place $110 inside; that's $25 on the 5 and 9, $30 on the 6 and 8. The shooter has 18 ways to hit these four numbers. If he does, the payoff is $35 on the first hit. Once that hit takes place, you lower your bet to $22 across, securing a profit of $13. Now, the rest of this shooter's roll is pure profit.
The thinking here is that the player has a 50-percent chance of winning this wager on any given roll as there are 36 possible combinations of which the 'one-hit-and-down' bettor has 18 of them favoring him. How long would you leave your $110 at risk? Some players would leave it up until it hits or loses to the 7. Others will give themselves a few shots at it before pulling it back.
Is this a good way to wager? Actually, yes, it is, well, kind of.
In a random game of craps, where the 7 is always a 1 in 6 probability, the house edge is a fixed mark, in the case of placing the 'inside numbers' of 5, 6, 8, and 9, that mark is about 2.6 percent. What that means is that the player making the 'inside numbers' bet will lose 2.6 percent of all the money he wagers – in the long run. If on one bet he has $110 at risk and on other bets he only has $22 at risk, the house edge is working on some average amount between the two extremes.
Of course, when regression betting is working to perfection (meaning it's violating the probability gods) and an inside number is hit early and often on shooter after shooter; it is a guaranteed one-roll win per shooter. But when the 7 shows before an inside number, the loss is brutal. Once you've lost the $110, if you continue to regress on future shooters as you planned will take approximately 10 shooters in a row to get past that first hit or one shooter to have a monster roll as you collect on your $22 across in $7 increments. Yeow!
How often will you be wiped off the board before an inside number can be hit? You'll win 18 times on your numbers, lose six times on that abominable 7. That means you'll win 3 times for a win of $35 + $35 +$35 = $105; then you'll lose once for a loss of $110. You're $5 in the hole. You'll have the same effects once you regress down to $22 across. You'll win $7 + $7 +$7 = $21 but you'll lose the fourth bet for $22. You'll be down $1.
The math of craps is annoying because it won't go away; it's implacable, like a dreaded in-law. While regression betting does reduce the house's take on your money, it does so because you are betting less, not because you have come up with a way to beat the game or reduce the house edge.
Still, 75 percent of the time using the above regression will result in being ahead of the game on a particular shooter. If you come to a casino and jump out ahead on the first few shooters, you're now in the catbird's seat. You might even consider changing your attack to stop going up on that $110 inside and instead continue with $22 inside on subsequent shooters.
Not all regressions are as drastic as the $110 and down that I've just explained. You could, for example, put $44 inside and when it hits once, go to a six dollar 6 and 8. A single hit on $44 inside would see you win $14. Now with just $12 at risk on the 6 and 8, you are ahead $2. Again such a betting strategy cannot turn a negative into a positive; the house has its damnable edge on each and every bet you make in a random game betting those inside numbers.
Is regression betting worth considering? Yes, it is, if you can stomach putting a lot down and losing it to a 'point-seven out' which will happen often enough to make even those with the strongest stomachs queasy.
Do I enjoy regression betting? No, I do not. As a general rule, once I've gone with a shooter (after assiduously applying the Captain's 5-Count), I'm usually on that shooter come hell or high water. Aturan bermain poker online. (Is high water considered good in this expression?) I prefer to take the risk to go for the bigger win by keeping my initial bets at their initial levels. But in math terms, against random rollers, I am giving the house a better whack at me than had I regressed.
Classic Regression Craps Strategy For Beginners
For controlled shooters, regression betting is probably a more powerful strategy than it is on random shooters. Why? Because controlled shooters will have a tendency to hit certain numbers more than their probabilities indicate (most merely attempt to avoid the 7) – and they will tend to have somewhat longer than average rolls. The longer a controlled shooter rolls, the better the chance that fatigue or distraction will alter his throw, either making the game random once again or, worse, precipitating the appearance of the 7. There is an intriguing speculation amongst the brain trust of Golden Touch™ that controlled shooters, when they are the least off, tend to hit more 7s than normal because they are still changing the nature of the game but, being off slightly, they are changing it for the worse! A regression bettor can capitalize on that and lock up wins before the 7 shows. Patrick foster gambling addiction.
Classic Regression Craps Strategy
Regression betting has its advocates and its opponents. Some people swear by it; some swear at it. In the final analysis, against random shooters, you're betting less; against controlled shooters, you might be getting in for some significant hits before coming down. If you like this as an idea, try it out on your next casino trip and see if you like it as much in reality.
Frank Scoblete is the #1 best-selling gaming author. His books and tapes have sold over a million copies. He is executive director of Golden Touch™ Craps dice-control seminars. His websites are www.scoblete.com and www.goldentouchcraps.com . For a free brochure or more information call: 1-800-944-0406 or write to: Paone Press, Box 610, Lynbrook, NY 11563.
